A living will

We didn't choose to be born and shouldn't be able to decide when we die.  Life and Death are the natural phenomenon of universe,  happens without any consent and stands the basic dimensions of life in this world. In between life and death is the span of life filled with joys,  sorrows, miseries, passion, compassion. If birth can't be determined then death follows the same rule, but overpowering the natural phenomenon,  a cheat code is induced into the society is Suicide.
We usually query, Can we decide our death and could change the cycle of life?
Millions will answer to this question - 'No', but on the other hand thousands will answer to this question - 'Yes'.
Bizzare, but ironically true,  we can call it 'a living will'. Provoking voices demands, if we have a 'right to life' then surely we have a right to 'a living will' as well. Normally, helping a person to die by suicide is a crime but if a legal assistance is provided in order to end sufferings from terminal illness or have right to choose to end their lives and to receive help to do so as long as safeguards are in place is assisted suicide or assisted dying or to be more specific 'physician-assisted suicide (PAS). Few countries are legalising assisted suicide under certain circumstances including Canada, Belgium, the Netherlands, Luxembourg, Columbia, Switzerland and parts of the United States and Australias.  SC's judgements allows living will for terminally ill to be inforce in future for individuals suffering from incurable illness
Assisted suicide is a controversial topic approved by countries who involves a licensed physicians approved by the state in which the patient is resident people and are of sound mind, voluntarily and repeatedly expressing their wish  to die. A physician, examines a dying patient in hospital, hooked to morphine drips, ventilator and overcome anxiety with terrified relatives stand by helplessly.
Pros and Cons must be limelighted into the real world from both the 'supporters and opponents ' perspective where all sorts of insignificant facts needed to be highlighted on this complex issue. The core for argument is maximizing individual autonomy and minimizing human suffering. No right is issued and can never be issued as its core is not determined and can never guaranty the right side. It takes heroic charity and humility to let others sustain us when we are absolutely incapable of sustaining ourselves. We must be willing to accept the bitter truth that,  in the end, we may have to become a burden to those who love us,  and are they willing to accept us or reject us.
In India,  the court held that right to life under Article 21 of the constitution does not include the right to die and cases stated so far in Supreme Court are strictly being analysed and relevant judgement is expected to be delivered. This debating issue has always been discussed under various dimensions in India. The right-to-die movement has gained renewed momentum around the nations.
Request for premature ending in life has contributed to the debate cuts across complex and dynamic aspects such as legal,  ethical, human rights,  health,  religious, economic, spiritual, social and cultural aspects of the civilised society. Do you think Assisted suicide is need of an hour or it is wrong in context of humanity. When a person is not willing to live and undergoing several pains for desires for release and wants to die peacefully, should be given a legal nod of a living will. We Indians so much indulged into morals values culture and emotions - Will seek it Right or Wrong is a question of an hour.
Why can't we let the suffering person themselves decide for ending a life in peaceful manner in the way they want and desires. The concept of right to life is compatible and consistent during the running period of life but incompatible and inconsistent during terminal illness where all will for survival dies as the person is left for nothing but to be a burden on self and everybody else.